ÓÑÇéÌáʾ£ºÈç¹û±¾ÍøÒ³´ò¿ªÌ«Âý»òÏÔʾ²»ÍêÕû£¬Çë³¢ÊÔÊó±êÓÒ¼ü¡°Ë¢Ð¡±±¾ÍøÒ³£¡ÔĶÁ¹ý³Ì·¢ÏÖÈκδíÎóÇë¸æËßÎÒÃÇ£¬Ð»Ð»£¡£¡ ±¨¸æ´íÎó
86¶ÁÊé ·µ»Ø±¾ÊéĿ¼ ÎÒµÄÊé¼Ü ÎÒµÄÊéÇ© TXTÈ«±¾ÏÂÔØ ½øÈëÊé°É ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©

30+mba-µÚ14ÕÂ

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



a¡¡few¡¡years¡£¡¡
The¡¡weakness¡¡of¡¡CAPM¡¡is¡¡that¡¡it¡¡assumes¡¡all¡¡investors¡¡are¡¡rational¡¡and¡¡
well¡¡informed£»¡¡that¡¡markets¡¡are¡¡perfect¡¡and¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡an¡¡unlimited¡¡supply¡¡
of¡¡risk¡­free¡¡money¡£¡¡There¡¡are¡¡even¡¡more¡¡plex¡¡models¡¡for¡¡calculating¡¡the¡¡
cost¡¡of¡¡equity¡¡capital£»¡¡but¡¡none¡¡are¡¡without¡¡their¡¡critics¡£¡¡
Weighted¡¡average¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡¡
Having¡¡identified¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡equity¡¡and¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡borrowed¡¡capital¡¡£¨and¡¡
that¡¡of¡¡any¡¡other¡¡long¡­term¡¡source¡¡of¡¡finance¡¡such¡¡as¡¡hire¡¡purchase¡¡or¡¡mortgages£©£»¡¡
we¡¡need¡¡to¡¡bine¡¡them¡¡into¡¡one¡¡overall¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡
primarily¡¡for¡¡use¡¡in¡¡project¡¡appraisals¡¡as¡¡justification¡¡of¡¡those¡¡that¡¡yield¡¡a¡¡
return¡¡in¡¡excess¡¡of¡¡their¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡£
72¡¡The¡¡Thirty¡­Day¡¡MBA¡¡
An¡¡average¡¡cost¡¡is¡¡required¡¡because¡¡we¡¡do¡¡not¡¡usually¡¡identify¡¡each¡¡
individual¡¡project¡¡with¡¡one¡¡particular¡¡source¡¡of¡¡finance¡£¡¡Because¡¡equity¡¡and¡¡
debt¡¡capital¡¡have¡¡very¡¡different¡¡costs£»¡¡we¡¡would¡¡make¡¡illogical¡¡decisions¡¡and¡¡
accept¡¡a¡¡project¡¡financed¡¡by¡¡debt¡¡capital¡¡only¡¡to¡¡reject¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡project¡¡next¡¡
time¡¡round¡¡when¡¡it¡¡was¡¡financed¡¡by¡¡equity¡¡capital¡£¡¡Generally¡¡businesses¡¡
take¡¡the¡¡view¡¡that¡¡all¡¡projects¡¡have¡¡been¡¡financed¡¡from¡¡a¡¡mon¡¡pool¡¡
of¡¡money¡¡except¡¡for¡¡the¡¡relatively¡¡rare¡¡case¡¡when¡¡project¡­specific¡¡finance¡¡
is¡¡raised¡£¡¡The¡¡weightings¡¡used¡¡in¡¡the¡¡calculations¡¡should¡¡be¡¡based¡¡on¡¡
the¡¡market¡¡value¡¡of¡¡the¡¡securities¡¡and¡¡not¡¡on¡¡their¡¡book¡¡or¡¡balance¡¡sheet¡¡
values¡£¡¡
Example¡¡
Assume¡¡your¡¡pany¡¡intends¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡the¡¡gearing¡¡ratio¡¡of¡¡borrowed¡¡capital¡¡
to¡¡equity¡¡in¡¡the¡¡proportion¡¡of¡¡20¡¡£º¡¡80¡£¡¡The¡¡nominal¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡new¡¡capital¡¡
from¡¡these¡¡sources¡¡has¡¡been¡¡assessed£»¡¡say£»¡¡at¡¡10¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡and¡¡15¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡
respectively¡¡and¡¡corporation¡¡tax¡¡is¡¡30¡¡per¡¡cent¡£¡¡The¡¡calculation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡overall¡¡
weighted¡¡average¡¡cost¡¡is¡¡as¡¡follows£º¡¡
Type¡¡of¡¡capital¡¡Proportion¡¡£¨a£©¡¡A¡£¡£er¡­tax¡¡cost¡¡£¨b£©¡¡Weighted¡¡cost¡¡£¨a¡¡¡Á¡¡b£©¡¡
10£¥¡¡loan¡¡capital¡¡0¡£20¡¡7¡£0£¥¡¡1¡£4£¥¡¡
Equity¡¡0¡£80¡¡15¡£0£¥¡¡12¡£0£¥¡¡
13¡£4£¥¡¡
The¡¡resulting¡¡weighted¡¡average¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡13¡£4¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡is¡¡the¡¡minimum¡¡rate¡¡
that¡¡this¡¡pany¡¡should¡¡accept¡¡on¡¡proposed¡¡investments¡£¡¡Any¡¡investment¡¡
that¡¡is¡¡not¡¡expected¡¡to¡¡achieve¡¡this¡¡return¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡viable¡¡proposition¡£¡¡Risk¡¡
has¡¡been¡¡allowed¡¡for¡¡in¡¡the¡¡calculation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡beta¡¡factor¡¡used¡¡in¡¡the¡¡CAPM¡¡
method¡¡of¡¡identifying¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡equity¡£¡¡This¡¡relates¡¡to¡¡the¡¡risk¡¡of¡¡the¡¡
existing¡¡whole¡¡business¡£¡¡If¡¡a¡¡pany¡¡embarks¡¡on¡¡a¡¡project¡¡of¡¡significantly¡¡
different¡¡risk£»¡¡or¡¡has¡¡a¡¡divisional¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡activities¡¡of¡¡varying¡¡risk¡¡levels£»¡¡
then¡¡a¡¡single¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡equity¡¡for¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡pany¡¡is¡¡inappropriate¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡
situation£»¡¡the¡¡average¡¡beta¡¡of¡¡proxy¡¡panies¡¡operating¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡field¡¡
as¡¡a¡¡division¡¡can¡¡be¡¡used¡£¡¡
INVESTMENT¡¡DECISIONS¡¡
The¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡¡is¡¡an¡¡important¡¡figure¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡in¡¡essence¡¡the¡¡threshold¡¡
for¡¡future¡¡investments¡£¡¡Taking¡¡the¡¡figures¡¡shown¡¡above£»¡¡if¡¡our¡¡weighted¡¡
average¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡¡is¡¡13¡£4¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡then¡¡taking¡¡on¡¡any¡¡new¡¡activity¡¡that¡¡
makes¡¡a¡¡lower¡¡profit¡¡ratio¡¡will¡¡be¡¡lowering¡¡the¡¡performance£»¡¡hardly¡¡an¡¡
MBA¡¡type¡¡of¡¡activity¡£¡¡
Investment¡¡decisions£»¡¡where¡¡the¡¡decisions¡¡have¡¡cost¡¡and¡¡revenue¡¡implications¡¡
for¡¡years£»¡¡perhaps¡¡even¡¡decades£»¡¡fall¡¡into¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡categories£º
Finance¡¡73¡¡
¡£¡¡Bolt¡­on¡¡investments£º¡¡These¡¡are¡¡where¡¡an¡¡investment¡¡will¡¡be¡¡supporting¡¡
and¡¡enhancing¡¡an¡¡existing¡¡operation¡£¡¡For¡¡example£»¡¡if¡¡part¡¡of¡¡a¡¡production¡¡
process¡¡is¡¡being¡¡slowed¡¡down¡¡for¡¡want¡¡of¡¡some¡¡new¡¡equipment¡¡to¡¡
eliminate¡¡a¡¡bo¡£¡£leneck¡£¡¡
¡£¡¡Standalone¡¡single¡¡project£º¡¡This¡¡involves¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡accept¡¡or¡¡reject¡¡
decision¡£¡¡
¡£¡¡peting¡¡projects£º¡¡This¡¡requires¡¡a¡¡choice¡¡of¡¡which¡¡produces¡¡the¡¡best¡¡
results£»¡¡either¡¡because¡¡only¡¡one¡¡can¡¡be¡¡pursued¡¡or¡¡because¡¡of¡¡limited¡¡
finance¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡la¡£¡£er¡¡case¡¡this¡¡is¡¡described¡¡as¡¡capital¡¡rationing¡£¡¡
What¡¡follows¡¡is¡¡an¡¡examination¡¡of¡¡the¡¡financial¡¡aspects¡¡of¡¡investment¡¡
decisions¡£¡¡There¡¡may¡¡well¡¡be¡¡other¡¡strategic¡¡reasons¡¡for¡¡taking¡¡investment¡¡
decisions£»¡¡including¡¡those¡¡that¡¡might¡¡be¡¡more¡¡important¡¡than¡¡finance¡¡
alone¡£¡¡For¡¡example£»¡¡it¡¡could¡¡be¡¡imperative¡¡to¡¡deny¡¡a¡¡petitor¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡
opportunity£»¡¡or¡¡if¡¡part¡¡of¡¡achieving¡¡a¡¡national¡¡or¡¡global¡¡strategy¡¡calls¡¡for¡¡
disproportionate¡¡expenses¡¡in¡¡one¡¡or¡¡more¡¡areas¡£¡¡However£»¡¡there¡¡are¡¡NO¡¡
circumstances¡¡when¡¡any¡¡investment¡¡decision¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡
proper¡¡financial¡¡appraisal¡¡and¡¡so¡¡at¡¡least¡¡see¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡accepting¡¡a¡¡lower¡¡
return¡¡than¡¡required¡¡by¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡¡being¡¡used¡£¡¡
Also£»¡¡it¡¯s¡¡important¡¡to¡¡note¡¡that¡¡any¡¡methodology¡¡for¡¡appraising¡¡investments¡¡
requires¡¡that¡¡cash¡¡is¡¡used¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡profits£»¡¡for¡¡reasons¡¡that¡¡will¡¡
bee¡¡apparent¡¡as¡¡the¡¡techniques¡¡are¡¡explained¡£¡¡Profit¡¡is¡¡not¡¡ignored£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡
simply¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡work¡¡its¡¡way¡¡through¡¡in¡¡the¡¡timing¡¡of¡¡events¡£¡¡
COBRA¡¡BEER¡¡
In¡¡1990£»¡¡Cambridge¡­educated¡¡and¡¡recently¡¡qualified¡¡accountant¡¡Karan¡¡
Bilimoria¡¡started¡¡importing¡¡and¡¡distributing¡¡Cobra¡¡beer£»¡¡a¡¡name¡¡he¡¡
chose¡¡because¡¡it¡¡appeared¡¡to¡¡work¡¡well¡¡in¡¡lots¡¡of¡¡different¡¡languages¡£¡¡
He¡¡initially¡¡supplied¡¡his¡¡beer¡¡to¡¡plement¡¡Indian¡¡restaurant¡¡food¡¡in¡¡
the¡¡UK¡£¡¡Lord¡¡Bilimoria£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡now¡¡is£»¡¡started¡¡out¡¡with¡¡debts¡¡of¡¡¡ê20£»000£»¡¡
but¡¡from¡¡a¡¡small¡¡flat¡¡in¡¡Fulham¡¡and¡¡with¡¡just¡¡a¡¡Citroen¡¡CV¡¡by¡¡way¡¡of¡¡
assets¡¡he¡¡has¡¡grown¡¡his¡¡business¡¡to¡¡sales¡¡of¡¡over¡¡¡ê100¡¡million¡¡a¡¡year¡£¡¡
Three¡¡factors¡¡have¡¡been¡¡key¡¡to¡¡its¡¡success¡£¡¡Cobra¡¡was¡¡originally¡¡sold¡¡in¡¡
large¡¡660ml¡¡bottles¡¡and¡¡so¡¡were¡¡more¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡be¡¡shared¡¡by¡¡diners¡£¡¡Also£»¡¡
as¡¡Cobra¡¡is¡¡less¡¡fizzy¡¡than¡¡European¡¡lagers£»¡¡drinkers¡¡are¡¡less¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡feel¡¡
bloated¡¡and¡¡can¡¡eat¡¡and¡¡drink¡¡more¡£¡¡The¡¡third¡¡factor¡¡was¡¡Bilimoria¡¯s¡¡
extensive¡¡knowledge£»¡¡through¡¡his¡¡training¡¡as¡¡an¡¡accountant£»¡¡of¡¡sources¡¡
of¡¡finance¡¡for¡¡a¡¡growing¡¡business¡£¡¡He¡¡was¡¡fortunate¡¡in¡¡having¡¡an¡¡oldstyle¡¡
bank¡¡manager¡¡who¡¡had¡¡such¡¡belief¡¡in¡¡Cobra¡¡that¡¡he¡¡agreed¡¡a¡¡
loan¡¡of¡¡¡ê30£»000£»¡¡but¡¡since¡¡then¡¡he¡¡has¡¡had¡¡to¡¡tap¡¡into¡¡every¡¡possible¡¡
type¡¡of¡¡funding¡¡£¨see¡¡Figure¡¡2¡£1£©£»¡¡including¡¡selling¡¡a¡¡28¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡stake¡¡in¡¡
his¡¡firm¡¡in¡¡1995¡£
Figure¡¡2¡£1¡¡Cobra¡¡Beer¡¯s¡¡financing¡¡strategy¡¡
0¡¡
10¡¡
20¡¡
30¡¡
40¡¡
50¡¡
60¡¡
70¡¡
80
1989¡¡
1990¡¡
1991¡¡
1992¡¡
1993¡¡
1994¡¡
1995¡¡
1996¡¡
1997¡¡
1998¡¡
1999¡¡
2000¡¡
2001¡¡
2002¡¡
2003¡¡
2004¡¡
Jul¡¡89¡¡¡ê7K¡¡
Overdraft¡¡
Nov¡¡89¡¡
¡ê4K¡¡
Overdraft¡¡
Dec¡¡89¡¡
¡ê5K¡¡
Overdraft¡¡
Jul¡¡90¡¡
¡ê55K¡¡
SFLGS¡¡
Loan¡¡
Feb¡¡91¡¡
¡ê100K¡¡Bill¡¡
of¡¡
Exchange¡¡
Jan¡¡92¡¡
¡ê50K¡¡
Preference¡¡
Shares¡¡
Feb¡¡93¡¡
75£¥¡¡
Advance¡¡
Factoring¡¡
Facility¡¡
Oct¡¡93¡¡5£¥¡¡
Equity¡¡for¡¡
¡ê50K¡¡
Dec¡¡93¡¡
¡ê190K¡¡SFLGS¡¡
Loan¡¡
Oct¡¡94¡¡
¡ê200K¡¡
Convertible¡¡
Preference¡¡
Shares¡¡
Dec¡¡95¡¡
¡ê500K¡¡
Private¡¡
Placement¡¡
Sold¡¡23£¥¡¡
Equity¡¡
May¡¡96¡¡OD¡¡
increased¡¡to¡¡
¡ê30K¡¡
Jun¡¡96¡¡
Invoice¡¡
Finance¡¡80£¥¡¡
Advance¡¡
Sep¡¡96¡¡DD¡¡
Facility¡¡
¡ê75K¡¡
Dec¡¡97¡¡OD¡¡
increased¡¡to¡¡
¡ê60K¡¡
Jan¡¡98¡¡DD¡¡
Facility¡¡
¡ê125K¡¡
Jul¡¡98¡¡
¡ê100K¡¡
Convertible¡¡
Preference¡¡
Shares¡¡
Sep¡¡98¡¡NMB¡¡
Heller¡¡
Invoice¡¡
Facility¡¡
85£¥¡¡
Advance¡¡
Nov¡¡98¡¡
¡ê750K¡¡
Convertible¡¡
Preference¡¡
Shares¡¡
Apr¡¡99¡¡OD¡¡
raised¡¡to¡¡
¡ê150K¡¡
Aug¡¡99¡¡
DD¡¡
Facility¡¡
¡ê250K¡¡
Jan¡¡00¡¡
Trade¡¡
Finance¡¡
Facility¡¡
¡ê450K¡¡
Universal¡¡
Impex¡¡
Aug¡¡00¡¡DD¡¡
Facility¡¡
¡ê350K¡¡
Feb¡¡01¡¡DD¡¡
Facility¡¡
¡ê600K¡¡
Jan¡¡02¡¡DD¡¡
Facility¡¡
¡ê1¡£6m¡¡
Oct¡¡2002¡¡
OD¡¡facility¡¡
¡ê400K¡¡HBOS¡¡
¡ê1¡£65m¡¡loan¡¡
HBOS¡¡
¡ê2¡£5m¡¡
replacement¡¡of¡¡
Invoice¡¡
discounting¡¡
facility¡¡
Apr¡¡2003¡¡
¡ê4m¡¡New¡¡
Preference¡¡
Shares¡¡
¡ê2m¡¡DD¡¡facility¡¡
Sales¡¡¡êmillions
Finance¡¡75¡¡
Payback¡¡period¡¡
The¡¡most¡¡popular¡¡method¡¡for¡¡evaluating¡¡investment¡¡decisions¡¡is¡¡the¡¡payback¡¡
method¡£¡¡To¡¡arrive¡¡at¡¡the¡¡payback¡¡period¡¡you¡¡have¡¡to¡¡work¡¡out¡¡how¡¡
many¡¡years¡¡it¡¡takes¡¡to¡¡recover¡¡your¡¡cash¡¡investment¡£¡¡Table¡¡2¡£2¡¡shows¡¡two¡¡
investment¡¡projects¡¡that¡¡require¡¡respectively¡¡¡ê20£»000¡¡and¡¡¡ê40£»000¡¡cash¡¡now¡¡
in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡get¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡cash¡¡returns¡¡spread¡¡over¡¡the¡¡next¡¡five¡¡years¡£¡¡
Table¡¡2¡£2¡¡The¡¡payback¡¡method¡¡
¡ê¡¡¡ê¡¡
Investment¡¡A¡¡Investment¡¡B¡¡
Initial¡¡cash¡¡cost¡¡NOW¡¡£¨Year¡¡0£©¡¡20£»000¡¡40£»000¡¡
Net¡¡cash¡¡flows¡¡
Year¡¡1¡¡1£»000¡¡10£»000¡¡
Year¡¡2¡¡4£»000¡¡10£»000¡¡
Year¡¡3¡¡8£»000¡¡16£»000¡¡
Year¡¡4¡¡7£»000¡¡4£»000¡¡
Year¡¡5¡¡5£»000¡¡28£»000¡¡
Total¡¡cash¡¡in¡¡over¡¡period¡¡25£»000¡¡68£»000¡¡
Cash¡¡surplus¡¡5£»000¡¡28£»000¡¡
Although¡¡both¡¡propositions¡¡call¡¡for¡¡different¡¡amounts¡¡of¡¡cash¡¡to¡¡be¡¡invested£»¡¡
we¡¡can¡¡see¡¡that¡¡both¡¡recover¡¡all¡¡their¡¡cash¡¡outlays¡¡by¡¡year¡¡4¡£¡¡So¡¡we¡¡
can¡¡say¡¡these¡¡investments¡¡have¡¡a¡¡four¡­year¡¡payback¡£¡¡But¡¡as¡¡a¡¡ma¡£¡£er¡¡of¡¡fact¡¡
Investment¡¡B¡¡produces¡¡a¡¡much¡¡bigger¡¡surplus¡¡than¡¡the¡¡other¡¡project¡¡and¡¡it¡¡
returns¡¡half¡¡our¡¡initial¡¡cash¡¡outlay¡¡in¡¡two¡¡years¡£¡¡Investment¡¡A¡¡has¡¡returned¡¡
only¡¡a¡¡quarter¡¡of¡¡our¡¡cash¡¡over¡¡that¡¡time¡¡period¡£¡¡
Payback¡¡may¡¡be¡¡simple£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡much¡¡use¡¡when¡¡it¡¡es¡¡to¡¡dealing¡¡
with¡¡the¡¡timing¡¡or¡¡with¡¡paring¡¡different¡¡investment¡¡amounts¡£¡¡
Discounted¡¡cash¡¡flow¡¡
We¡¡know¡¡intuitively¡¡that¡¡ge¡£¡£ing¡¡cash¡¡in¡¡sooner¡¡is¡¡be¡£¡£er¡¡than¡¡ge¡£¡£ing¡¡it¡¡in¡¡
later¡£¡¡In¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡a¡¡pound¡¡received¡¡now¡¡is¡¡worth¡¡more¡¡than¡¡a¡¡pound¡¡
that¡¡will¡¡arrive¡¡in¡¡one£»¡¡two¡¡or¡¡more¡¡years¡¡in¡¡the¡¡future¡¡because¡¡of¡¡what¡¡we¡¡
could¡¡do¡¡with¡¡that¡¡money¡¡ourselves£»¡¡or¡¡because¡¡of¡¡what¡¡we¡¡ourselves¡¡have¡¡
to¡¡pay¡¡out¡¡to¡¡have¡¡use¡¡of¡¡that¡¡money¡¡£¨see¡¡Cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡¡above£©¡£¡¡To¡¡make¡¡
sound¡¡investment¡¡decisions¡¡we¡¡need¡¡to¡¡ascribe¡¡a¡¡value¡¡to¡¡a¡¡future¡¡stream¡¡
76¡¡The¡¡Thirty¡­Day¡¡MBA¡¡
of¡¡earnings¡¡to¡¡arrive¡¡at¡¡what¡¡is¡¡known¡¡as¡¡the¡¡present¡¡value¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡know¡¡
we¡¡could¡¡earn¡¡20¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡on¡¡any¡¡money¡¡we¡¡have£»¡¡then¡¡the¡¡maximum¡¡we¡¡
would¡¡be¡¡prepared¡¡to¡¡pay¡¡for¡¡a¡¡pound¡¡ing¡¡in¡¡one¡¡year¡¡hence¡¡would¡¡
be¡¡around¡¡80p¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡were¡¡to¡¡pay¡¡one¡¡pound¡¡now¡¡to¡¡get¡¡a¡¡pound¡¡back¡¡in¡¡a¡¡
year¡¯s¡¡time¡¡we¡¡would¡¡in¡¡effect¡¡be¡¡losing¡¡money¡£¡¡
The¡¡technique¡¡used¡¡to¡¡handle¡¡this¡¡is¡¡known¡¡as¡¡discounting¡£¡¡The¡¡process¡¡
is¡¡termed¡¡discounted¡¡cash¡¡flow¡¡£¨DCF£©¡¡and¡¡the¡¡residual¡¡discounted¡¡cash¡¡is¡¡
called¡¡the¡¡net¡¡present¡¡value¡£¡¡
Table¡¡2¡£3¡¡Using¡¡discounted¡¡cash¡¡flow¡¡£¨DCF£©¡¡
¡ê¡¡Discount¡¡factor¡¡Discounted¡¡
Cash¡¡flow¡¡at¡¡15£¥¡¡cash¡¡flow¡¡
A¡¡B¡¡A¡¡¡Á¡¡B¡¡
Initial¡¡cash¡¡cost¡¡NOW¡¡£¨Year¡¡0£©¡¡20£»000¡¡1¡£00¡¡20£»000¡¡
Net¡¡cash¡¡flows¡¡
Year¡¡1¡¡1£»000¡¡0¡£8695¡¡870¡¡
Year¡¡2¡¡4£»000¡¡0¡£7561¡¡3£»024¡¡
Year¡¡3¡¡8£»000¡¡0¡£6575¡¡5£»260¡¡
Year¡¡4¡¡7£»000¡¡0¡£5717¡¡4£»002¡¡
Year¡¡5¡¡5£»000¡¡0¡£4972¡¡2£»486¡¡
Total¡¡25£»000¡¡15£»642¡¡
Cash¡¡surplus¡¡5£»000¡¡Net¡¡present¡¡
value¡¡
£¨4£»358£©¡¡
The¡¡first¡¡column¡¡in¡¡Table¡¡2¡£3¡¡shows¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡cash¡­flow¡¡implications¡¡of¡¡
an¡¡investment¡¡proposition£»¡¡a¡¡surplus¡¡of¡¡¡ê5£»000¡¡es¡¡a¡£¡£er¡¡five¡¡years¡¡from¡¡
pu¡£¡£ing¡¡¡ê20£»000¡¡into¡¡a¡¡project¡£¡¡But¡¡if¡¡we¡¡accept¡¡the¡¡proposition¡¡that¡¡future¡¡
cash¡¡is¡¡worth¡¡less¡¡than¡¡current¡¡cash£»¡¡the¡¡only¡¡question¡¡we¡¡need¡¡to¡¡answer¡¡is¡¡
how¡¡much¡¡less¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡take¡¡our¡¡weighted¡¡average¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡capital¡¡as¡¡a¡¡sensible¡¡
starting¡¡point£»¡¡we¡¡would¡¡select¡¡13¡£4¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡as¡¡an¡¡appropriate¡¡rate¡¡at¡¡which¡¡
to¡¡discount¡¡future¡¡cash¡¡flows¡£¡¡To¡¡keep¡¡the¡¡numbers¡¡simple¡¡and¡¡to¡¡add¡¡a¡¡
small¡¡margin¡¡of¡¡safety£»¡¡let¡¯s¡¡assume¡¡that¡¡15¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡is¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡we¡¡have¡¡
selected¡¡£¨this¡¡doesn¡¯t¡¡ma¡£¡£er¡¡too¡¡much£»¡¡as¡¡you¡¡will¡¡see¡¡in¡¡the¡¡section¡¡on¡¡
internal¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡return£©¡£¡¡
The¡¡formula¡¡for¡¡calculating¡¡what¡¡a¡¡pound¡¡received¡¡at¡¡some¡¡future¡¡date¡¡
is£º¡¡
Present¡¡Value¡¡£¨PV£©¡¡=¡¡¡êP¡¡X¡¡1¡¡
£¨1£«r£©n
Finance¡¡77¡¡
where¡¡¡êP¡¡is¡¡the¡¡initial¡¡cash¡¡cost£»¡¡r¡¡is¡¡the¡¡interest¡¡rate¡¡expressed¡¡in¡¡decimals¡¡
and¡¡n¡¡is¡¡the¡¡year¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡cash¡¡will¡¡arrive¡£¡¡So¡¡if¡¡we¡¡decide¡¡on¡¡a¡¡discount¡¡
rate¡¡of¡¡15¡¡per¡¡cent£»¡¡the¡¡present¡¡value¡¡of¡¡a¡¡pound¡¡received¡¡in¡¡one¡¡year¡¯s¡¡time¡¡
is£º¡¡
Present¡¡Value¡¡=¡¡¡ê1¡¡X¡¡1¡¡
£¨1¡¡£«¡¡0¡£15£©¡¡1¡¡=¡¡0¡£87¡¡£¨rounded¡¡to¡¡two¡¡decimal¡¡places£©¡£¡¡
So¡¡we¡¡can¡¡see¡¡that¡¡our¡¡¡ê1£»000¡¡arriving¡¡at¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡year¡¡1¡¡has¡¡a¡¡present¡¡
value¡¡of¡¡¡ê870£»¡¡the¡¡¡ê4£»000¡¡in¡¡year¡¡2¡¡has¡¡a¡¡present¡¡value¡¡of¡¡¡ê3£»024¡¡and¡¡by¡¡
year¡¡5¡¡present¡¡value¡¡reduces¡¡cash¡¡flows¡¡to¡¡barely¡¡half¡¡their¡¡original¡¡figure¡£¡¡
In¡¡fact£»¡¡far¡¡from¡¡having¡¡a¡¡real¡¡payback¡¡in¡¡year¡¡4¡¡and¡¡generating¡¡a¡¡cash¡¡
surplus¡¡of¡¡¡ê5£»000£»¡¡this¡¡project¡¡will¡¡make¡¡us¡¡¡ê4£»358¡¡worse¡¡off¡¡than¡¡we¡¡had¡¡
hoped¡¡to¡¡be¡¡if¡¡we¡¡required¡¡to¡¡make¡¡a¡¡return¡¡of¡¡15¡¡per¡¡cent¡£¡¡The¡¡project£»¡¡in¡¡
other¡¡words£»¡¡fails¡¡to¡¡meet¡¡our¡¡criteria¡¡using¡¡DCF¡¡but¡¡might¡¡well¡¡have¡¡been¡¡
pursued¡¡using¡¡payback¡£¡¡
Internal¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡return¡¡£¨IRR£©¡¡
DCF¡¡is¡¡a¡¡useful¡¡starting¡¡point¡¡but¡¡does¡¡not¡¡give¡¡us¡¡any¡¡definitive¡¡information¡£¡¡
For¡¡example£»¡¡all¡¡we¡¡know¡¡about¡¡the¡¡above¡¡project¡¡is¡¡that¡¡it¡¡doesn¡¯t¡¡
make¡¡a¡¡return¡¡of¡¡15¡¡per¡¡cent¡£¡¡In¡¡order¡¡to¡¡know¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡return¡¡we¡¡
need¡¡to¡¡choose¡¡a¡¡discount¡¡rate¡¡that¡¡produces¡¡a¡¡net¡¡present¡¡value¡¡of¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡
cash¡¡flow¡¡of¡¡zero£»¡¡known¡¡as¡¡the¡¡internal¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡return¡£¡¡The¡¡maths¡¡is¡¡time¡¡
consuming¡¡but¡¡Solutions¡¡Matrix¡¡website¡¡£¨solutionmatrix£©¡¡has¡¡a¡¡
tool¡¡for¡¡working¡¡out¡¡payback£»¡¡discounted¡¡cash¡¡flow£»¡¡internal¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡return£»¡¡
and¡¡a¡¡whole¡¡lot¡¡more¡¡calculations¡¡relating¡¡to¡¡capital¡¡budgeting¡£¡¡You¡¡have¡¡
to¡¡register¡¡on¡¡the¡¡site¡¡first¡¡before¡¡downloading¡¡their¡¡free¡¡capital¡¡budgeting¡¡
spreadsheet¡¡suite¡¡and¡¡tutorial¡£¡¡From¡¡the¡¡home¡¡page¡¡you¡¡should¡¡click¡¡on¡¡
¡®Download¡¡Center¡¯¡¡and¡¡¡®Download¡¡Financial¡¡Metrics¡¡Lite¡¡for¡¡Microso¡£¡£¡¡
Excel¡¯¡£¡¡
Using¡¡this¡¡spreadsheet¡¡you¡¡will¡¡see¡¡that¡¡the¡¡IRR¡¡for¡¡the¡¡project¡¡in¡¡question¡¡
is¡¡slightly¡¡under¡¡7¡¡per¡¡cent£»¡¡not¡¡much¡¡be¡£¡£er¡¡than¡¡bank¡¡interest¡¡and¡¡certainly¡¡
insufficient¡¡to¡¡warrant¡¡taking¡¡any¡¡risks¡¡for¡£¡¡
BUDGETS¡¡AND¡¡VARIANCES¡¡
Budgeting¡¡is¡¡the¡¡principal¡¡interface¡¡between¡¡the¡¡operating¡¡business¡¡units¡¡
and¡¡the¡¡finance¡¡department¡£¡¡As¡¡a¡¡staff¡¡function¡¡£¨see¡¡Chapter¡¡4¡¡for¡¡more¡¡
on¡¡line¡¡and¡¡staff¡¡functions£©£»¡¡the¡¡finance¡¡department¡¡will¡¡assist¡¡managers¡¡
in¡¡preparing¡¡a¡¡detailed¡¡budget¡¡for¡¡the¡¡year¡¡ahead¡¡for¡¡every¡¡area¡¡of¡¡the¡¡
organization¡¡and¡¡is¡¡in¡¡effect¡¡the¡¡first¡¡year¡¡of¡¡the¡¡business¡¡plan¡£¡¡MBAs¡¡are¡¡
invariably¡¡expected¡¡to¡¡play¡¡a¡¡role¡¡in¡¡facilitating¡¡the¡¡process¡¡within¡¡their¡¡
78¡¡The¡¡Thirty¡­Day¡¡MBA¡¡
departments¡£¡¡Budgets¡¡are¡¡usually¡¡reviewed¡¡at¡¡least¡¡halfway¡¡through¡¡the¡¡
year¡¡and¡¡o¡£¡£en¡¡quarterly¡£¡¡At¡¡that¡¡review¡¡a¡¡further¡¡quarter¡¡or¡¡half¡¡year¡¡ca
·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©
δÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
ÎÂÜ°Ìáʾ£º ο´Ð¡ËµµÄͬʱ·¢±íÆÀÂÛ£¬Ëµ³ö×Ô¼ºµÄ¿´·¨ºÍÆäËüС»ï°éÃÇ·ÖÏíÒ²²»´íŶ£¡·¢±íÊéÆÀ»¹¿ÉÒÔ»ñµÃ»ý·ÖºÍ¾­Ñé½±Àø£¬ÈÏÕæдԭ´´ÊéÆÀ ±»²ÉÄÉΪ¾«ÆÀ¿ÉÒÔ»ñµÃ´óÁ¿½ð±Ò¡¢»ý·ÖºÍ¾­Ñé½±ÀøŶ£¡